Steward's Fear - The Ultimate Solo Deck 1.0

• Versions
• 1.0

What do the > symbols mean in your description?

Doesn't matter what the > means. This is an absolutely horrible deck for this scenario, truly. You need cards the counteract shadow effects. Having Beregond only do defending is not enough. Very poor choices of allies. Asfaloth is also extremely hard to get onto the table because you need to play another card to give a hero a Lore resource, so location management absolutely sucks. I have no idea how or why this deck was even made. Not worth playing with at all.

@pd187540 your comment is so rude I’m honestly wondering if it’s a joke. If you have a negative experience with a deck, offer helpful suggestions to the person who took the time to make it.

@radAGHAST Unfortunately it’s not a joke. This troll has been going around trashing perfectly functional decks for a while now and does not seem interesting in listening to reason or calls for decency. Unfortunately I don’t see a function to report their behavior.

@MagicFleaNo need to report, I have been aware of this person's behavior for a while. Currently I don't plan to ban people or remove comments, however harsh, as long as they are directed at the decklist and not the deckbuilder.

I should also note that as the publisher of this decklist, @MadaoMadao is the moderator of this comment section and can simply click on the red 'X' next to a comment to hide it.

@SeastanThanks. Should the moderation extend to featured comments on the front page? His unexplained declaration of “garbage deck” on another decklist has apparently been moderated but still appears on the front page.

Criticism of specific decks are certainly allowed. Nothing you can do about it, and censorship will not be tolerated. The above strategy just fails to work after trying at least 3 times. Link to a video showing the strategy at work is needed.

@MagicFleaDone: github.com

@SeastanThanks. I appreciate your efforts!

Thankfully, this doesn't hide my comments everywhere :). Good luck with that! And I was just notified that Seastan has a one deck that beats everything uploaded 4 months ago. You would think that he would suggest that to me, but no. Some help that guy is!

@Seastan @MagicFlea Thanks for thinking about this.

@MadaoMadao I think you have the bones of a good deck. I think it's cool how you thought about the specific different plots. I always forget about Elfhelm and his super cool ability. One suggestion would be to try having more stuff for Beregond's resources to do. That could include more tactics cards, or Song of Kings/Song of Travel, or Blood of Numenor to make him a brick house. Thanks for sharing your ideas. =)

@pd187540i will try to get you a video today or tommorow. sorry but i just saw the comments. Just give me a bit of time to get some recording software going. @radAGHASTFrom my experience there are no tactics cards for that quest in this cardpool that are more desirable that any of the stuff put here. Errand riders are better than songs in that case as they have multiple uses and getting them in multiples is still useful. Beregond can pay for Gandalf as well.

@MadaoMadaoSpeaking from experience, having a video demonstrating your strategy working is no guarantee against this guy calling your deck trash. So only do it if you really want to.

It certainly would be a guarantee, and I would take back the trash comment. I already beat this scenario anyway using The One Deck, but it took me 4 attempts. I had no idea what "turtling" meant, which is what caused me to fail it.

Since you plan on using so few tactics card, have you considered just running spirit beregond? Hail of Stones against a boss is pretty funny, but the consistency of having 2 spirit heroes out of the box seems like it might be better.

@pd187540 Your video: www.youtube.com Took me a while to get the recording working. If you have any questions, ask. @Secheni would use Spirit Beregond (no contest) but he wasn't in the cardpool when the quest was relased and optimal progression expierience was what i was aiming for.