Wealth of the Dwarves

Questlogs using this decklist
None.
Fellowships using this decklist
None.
Derived from
None. Self-made deck here.
Inspiration for
Wealth of the Dwarves 2 0 8 2.0
Card draw simulator
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
The gameplay simulator is an experimental feature and is currently only available for those that support RingsDB development on Patreon.
Gameplay simulator
Round
0
Threat
0
Hand
In Play
Deck
Discard Pile

moghue42 5

moghue42 has a newer deck inspired by this one: Wealth of the Dwarves

This is meant to be a Gloin riches deck with the One Ring.

5 comments

May 05, 2021 nelloianiro 1015

I would add Resourceful for more money.

May 05, 2021 doomguard 1976

would add Sneak Attack

what role should that deck have? for solo its not enough questingpower i think (and Parting Gifts would make no sense) so fighting. he get much hitpoints and shadowcanceling with Inner Strength put in 3 Armor of Erebor then sentinel comes earlier and or more Song of Mocking then he need less sentinel

  • Hauberk of Mail you cannot use
  • A Burning Brand you cannot use (you can pay for it if it is 1. in planningphase, but not attach to him because he is not lore)

a Spare Pipe increase his hitpoints by additional 1.

with so much attachements Well-Equipped is a musthave. 3 times.

consider DĂșnedain Cache he can only engage 1 enemy per turn and will have 3-4 actions later in the game, with Gondorian Fire he can have a very good attack.

think about Self Preservation or do u want to start with Well Preserved? but then inner strength makes nearly no sense, you can only use one of them in a round, o.k. is still +1 defense

May 05, 2021 moghue42 5

Thank you, I have been changing it around all day. I realized Haubrek wasnt useful. Didn't think about burning brand, The hope would be to get a narvi's belt and then it would usually be useful. Well-Equipped x3 will be being fit in for certain. Starting with Well Preserved for sure.

May 05, 2021 doomguard 1976

with narvis belt, you can attach the A Burning Brand i forgot that

but is it worth it? it is restricted and a 2 cardcombo. before you have the belt the card is useless.

May 05, 2021 moghue42 5

You are totally correct in that. I did remove all the Warrior only things in the newest iteration. The 2 card combo while not completely "good" should help to make sure I don't get wrecked by a stray shadow card if I try to maximize the resource gain. Im not sure what it takes to update this when they are the same deck list.

I want to totally thank you for your input. I am super new. This seemed cool and I wanted to build something effective. Typically we have a 2-4 player pod, in some cases we may even have 2 groups doing the "competetive" scenarios. My hope with the deck is to provide good support by engaging less desirable monsters to snack on me while the rest of the party can build their boardstate a bit, and then potentially quest and defend multiple attacks per turn. The problem I am seeing right now is the inability to really deal much damage back with anything other than Gondorian Fire.

There are a lot of cards that are relying on other cards to be totally useful and I get that. I am almost to a first draft before building the deck to play in person. You definitely helped me get there!